reply
- Feature
- Like
That guy was completely overrated. Sure he could dance and sing, but the only reason he was as famous as he was was because of his famous family. I couldn't care less when i heard that he died, and I dont think that by ANY means ANYONE should EVER have to donate to ANYONE'S funeral. Especially MJ's.
reply
- Feature
- Like
no, i dont think that the people of LA should donate to MJ's funeral. he may be the king of pop but in the end he is what we all are, a person and the Jackson family has more than enough money to pay for a funeral. you wouldnt ask people to donate to the funeral of a man that wasnt famous would you?
reply
- Feature
- Like
i had read somewhere (like CNN or something...) that the service was coming out of our (California Residents) taxes. But either way, i think that asking the public to pay for his funeral is rather silly.
reply
- Feature
- Like
Of course they should. MJ should also be deified by the state and given a statue in the Pantheon. And his new name shall be "Michael Augustus Joseph Tiberius Jackson Caesar". Or, you know, maybe not.
reply
- Feature
- Like
No, that's booty. Though Michael Jackson was a talented individual... everyone in Los Angeles has their own bills to pay. I'm not sure Michael Jackson would be happy that with this arrangement. Doesn't it seem like a bit of a burden?
reply
- Feature
- Like
